AP Calculus AB and BC
Logarithmic vs Implicit Differentiation
Logarithmic differentiation is implicit differentiation applied to the equation ln y equals ln f of x, so it is a special case rather than a rival. Reach for it when the exponent contains x, since neither the power rule nor the exponential rule applies there.
Logarithmic differentiation
Use when: The variable appears in the exponent, or the function is a long product or quotient that logs would flatten into a sum of simple terms.
Implicit differentiation
Use when: You are handed an equation relating x and y that is not solved for y, and solving it would be ugly, impossible, or would break the function into branches.
Side by side
| Logarithmic differentiation | Implicit differentiation | |
|---|---|---|
| Where the equation comes from | You build it, by writing | You are given it, as in |
| When to reach for it | The exponent contains , as in | The relation cannot be solved for |
| Opening move | Take of both sides and expand with log rules | Differentiate both sides with respect to |
| Shape of the answer | in terms of alone, after substituting | usually in terms of both and |
| Relationship between them | A special case, applied to an equation you constructed | The general technique that the other one runs on |
The power rule wants a constant exponent and the exponential rule wants a constant base, so is outside the reach of both. Logs repair that in one step, since pulls the exponent down into a product the product rule can differentiate. Take logs of both sides, differentiate, and solve for .
The middle step is implicit differentiation and nothing else. Differentiating with respect to gives by the chain rule, exactly the move that turns into and then . Only the origin of the equation differs. One detail worth keeping: requires , so the careful version starts from , whose derivative is the same .
The two wrong derivatives of x to the x
Forcing the power rule onto gives , which collapses back to . Forcing the exponential rule onto it gives . Both are wrong, and the giveaway is that the correct answer is their sum. Treat that as a check on your work, not as a rule to memorise: once sits in the base and the exponent at once, either take logs and differentiate implicitly or rewrite as and use the chain rule.
Frequently asked questions
For x to the x, is that a power rule problem or a log differentiation problem?
Logarithmic differentiation. The power rule is stated for a constant , and here the exponent moves with , so the rule does not apply. Taking logs first gives .
Is logarithmic differentiation on the AP exam?
It is not a named technique in the Course and Exam Description, so a question that can only be done this way is unlikely. It is still worth having, because together with the rewrite it is one of only two routes to a variable base with a variable exponent, and it turns a four-factor quotient into a sum of four easy derivatives.
Why does y prime over y keep appearing?
Because is a function of , so differentiating needs the chain rule and produces . Multiplying both sides by at the end is what puts the original function back into the answer.
In the CED: Unit 3: Chain Rule, Implicit, and Inverses