AP Calculus AB and BC
Implicit Differentiation: Finding dy/dx Step by Step
Implicit differentiation finds dy/dx when an equation mixes x and y and you can't solve for y cleanly. Differentiate both sides with respect to x; each y-term picks up a dy/dx from the chain rule. Then gather the dy/dx terms, factor, and divide. Reach for it when y is trapped, like x^2 + y^2 = 25.
Spotting when to use implicit differentiation
Implicit differentiation is the tool when an equation ties and together and you cannot (or would rather not) solve for first. A circle such as is the classic signal: appears squared, so isolating it forces a and breaks the curve into two separate halves. Equations like or are worse still, because is tangled past anything clean algebra can undo. These are relations, not functions, and many of them fail the vertical line test outright.
The recognition question is short. Can you rewrite the equation as without a fight? If yes, do exactly that and differentiate with the ordinary rules from Units 2 and 3. If is trapped, mixed into products with , or raised to powers you cannot unwind, switch to implicit differentiation. You never isolate at all. You differentiate the equation as written and solve for the slope directly.
| Equation | Can you isolate ? | Best method |
|---|---|---|
| Already solved | Ordinary rules (product rule) | |
| Only with a | Implicit differentiation | |
| No clean way | Implicit differentiation | |
| Yes, | Either works |
The one idea behind the method
Every in the equation stands for an unnamed function of . So every you differentiate carries a hidden , supplied by the chain rule. That is the entire basis of Topic 3.2, and it is why the chain rule from Topic 3.1 has to come first.
The method: differentiate, then solve for dy/dx
Differentiate both sides of the equation with respect to . Terms built only from follow the rules you already know, and a constant differentiates to . The moment you differentiate a term containing , the chain rule fires. The derivative of is not ; it is , because you differentiate the outer power and then multiply by the derivative of the inside function: the inside is , and its derivative is . The general pattern is worth memorizing:
- Differentiate both sides with respect to , treating as a function of .
- Apply the chain rule to every -term, attaching a factor of ; use the product rule wherever and are multiplied.
- Move every term containing to one side and everything else to the other.
- Factor out and divide to isolate it.
Step four explains why the result almost always contains both and . That is not a mistake to fix. The slope of an implicit curve genuinely depends on which point you sit at, and naming a point on such a curve takes both coordinates. An answer like is a finished answer.
When a problem asks for the slope at a specific point, wait until after you have solved for , then substitute both coordinates. Substituting too early, before the derivative is isolated, throws away the you are trying to find.
The mistakes that cost points
The single most common error is differentiating a -term as if were . Writing silently drops the and corrupts every step after it. Every you touch earns its chain-rule factor, without exception.
The second trap shows up whenever and are multiplied, like the in . That term needs the product rule, and the -half of the product still needs its own . The correct expansion is . Skipping the product rule here is one of the most frequent free-response deductions in Unit 3.
The third slip is algebraic. After you collect the terms, factor out before you divide. Trying to divide term by term instead of factoring first is where a correct derivative turns into a wrong final fraction.
Extending to the second derivative
To find , differentiate the first derivative again with respect to . Two details do the damage. First, the first derivative usually still contains , so differentiating it calls for the chain rule (and often the quotient rule) a second time. Second, any that reappears in this pass should be replaced with the expression you already found, after which you simplify, often using the original equation to clean things up. Topic 3.6 formalizes higher-order derivatives; the circle example below runs the whole process end to end.
This is also why a second-derivative answer for a circle can collapse to something as tidy as : the original relation absorbs the that the algebra produces.
Worked examples
Worked example
The circle: a clean first derivative
Find for the circle , then find the slope at the point .
- Differentiate both sides with respect to , treating as an unknown function of : .
- The term gives by the power rule. The term needs the chain rule, so . The constant differentiates to , leaving .
- Move the -term across and divide by : , so .
- Now substitute the point , after the derivative is isolated: .
, which is at .
Worked example
A product term: xy needs the product rule
Find for .
- Differentiate each term with respect to . The middle term is a product of two functions of , so flag it for the product rule: .
- The power rule gives . The product rule gives , since . The chain rule gives .
- Assemble the pieces: .
- Gather the terms on one side and move the rest to the other: .
- Factor out , then divide: , so .
.
Worked example
The second derivative of the circle
Find for the circle .
- Start from the first derivative already found for this circle, .
- Differentiate again with respect to . The right side is a quotient, so use the quotient rule, remembering that : .
- Substitute the known : .
- Combine the numerator over : , so .
- The original equation says , so the result simplifies to .
.
Frequently asked questions
When should I use implicit differentiation instead of solving for y?
Use it whenever solving for is impossible or messy: appears to a power, sits inside a product with , or is buried in a trig or exponential expression. If you can write cleanly, the ordinary rules are faster. If you cannot, differentiate the equation as it stands.
Why does dy/dx appear when I differentiate a y-term?
Because is a function of . Differentiating is a chain-rule problem: the outer derivative times the derivative of the inside, which is . That is the derivative of the inner function, and it never disappears.
Why does my answer have both x and y in it?
That is normal and correct for implicit curves. The slope changes from point to point, and a point on a relation like needs both an and a to pin it down. To get a number, substitute a specific point after solving for .