AP Calculus AB and BC
Chain Rule vs Implicit Differentiation
Implicit differentiation is not a separate rule; it is the chain rule applied to y, treated as an unknown function of x. The derivative of y that appears whenever you differentiate a term containing y is exactly the chain rule factor. Reach for it when the equation mixes x and y instead of naming the inside function.
Chain rule
Use when: The inside function is written out, as in or , so its derivative can be computed on the spot.
Implicit differentiation
Use when: The inside function is itself, as in , so its derivative has to stay written as .
Side by side
| Chain rule | Implicit differentiation | |
|---|---|---|
| What it handles | A known function inside another | An unknown function of inside another |
| The inner derivative | Computable, such as for | Unknown, so it stays as |
| Worked example | ||
| How it finishes | The derivative is already isolated | Collect the terms, factor, then divide |
| Answer is in terms of | alone | Usually both and |
| Common trap | Forgetting the inner derivative | Differentiating as |
Write and the two methods collapse into one. Differentiating means differentiating , which the chain rule turns into . Renaming back to and back to gives the implicit result, so nothing new was used.
The real difference shows up after the differentiating is done. An ordinary chain rule problem ends with the answer written out. An implicit problem ends with an equation in which is the unknown, so there is an algebra stage: gather those terms on one side, factor out, and divide.
Where the factor goes missing
Terms in alone never pick up a , and terms containing always do. Differentiating gives , so . Skip the factor and there is nothing left to solve for, which is the signal that a step was dropped.
Frequently asked questions
Is implicit differentiation a different rule from the chain rule?
No. It is the chain rule used on , whose derivative is not known yet, so the inner factor stays written as .
Why do only the y terms pick up a dy/dx?
Because . Every term gets multiplied by the derivative of its inside function, and for a term in that factor is , so it never shows.
Can I use implicit differentiation on an ordinary function?
Yes, and it agrees. Differentiating implicitly gives , which is what the power rule gives directly.
In the CED: Unit 3: Chain Rule, Implicit, and Inverses