AP Calculus AB and BC

Limit of (e^(2x)-1)/x as x Approaches 0 Is 2

The limit of (e^(2x) - 1)/x as x approaches 0 is 2, not 1. Direct substitution gives 0/0. Multiply and divide by 2 to rebuild the standard form, 2 times (e^(2x) - 1)/(2x), whose second factor tends to 1. It is also the derivative of e^(2x) at 0, which is 2 by the chain rule.

limx0e2x1x=2\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{e^{2x}-1}{x} = 2

Settled by the limit definition of the derivative.

Rebuilding the standard form

The known result is limu0eu1u=1\lim_{u \to 0}\frac{e^u-1}{u} = 1, where the exponent and the denominator are the same thing. Here the exponent is 2x2x while the denominator is only xx, so repair the mismatch by multiplying and dividing by 22.

e2x1x=22e2x1x=2e2x12x\frac{e^{2x}-1}{x} = \frac{2}{2}\cdot\frac{e^{2x}-1}{x} = 2 \cdot \frac{e^{2x}-1}{2x}

Now set u=2xu = 2x. As x0x \to 0 the new variable also goes to 00, so the fraction on the right is the standard limit and contributes 11.

limx0e2x1x=2limu0eu1u=21=2\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{e^{2x}-1}{x} = 2\lim_{u \to 0} \frac{e^{u}-1}{u} = 2 \cdot 1 = 2

A factoring route to the same 2

Since e2x=(ex)2e^{2x} = \left(e^x\right)^2, the numerator is a difference of squares, (ex1)(ex+1)\left(e^x-1\right)\left(e^x+1\right). Dividing by xx splits it as ex1x(ex+1)\frac{e^x-1}{x}\cdot\left(e^x+1\right), and the two factors tend to 11 and 22.

The same limit as a derivative

Set f(t)=e2tf(t) = e^{2t}, so f(0)=1f(0) = 1 and the fraction is the difference quotient for ff based at 00. The limit is f(0)f'(0), and the chain rule is what supplies the inner coefficient.

f(t)=2e2t,f(0)=2e0=2f'(t) = 2e^{2t}, \qquad f'(0) = 2e^{0} = 2

That is the structural reason the answer is not 11. The graph of y=e2xy = e^{2x} crosses the yy-axis at the same height as y=exy = e^x but twice as steeply, and this limit reads off the steepness.

What direct substitution gives

At x=0x = 0 the exponent vanishes, so the numerator is 11=01 - 1 = 0 while the denominator is 00.

e2010=110=00\frac{e^{2 \cdot 0}-1}{0} = \frac{1-1}{0} = \frac{0}{0}

The form is indeterminate, so the value is still open. L'Hopital's rule is available and lands on the same number in one pass, because differentiating the top brings the 22 down.

limx0e2x1x=limx02e2x1=2\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{e^{2x}-1}{x} = \lim_{x \to 0} \frac{2e^{2x}}{1} = 2

The mistakes students make

  • Answering 11 from memory of ex1x\frac{e^x-1}{x}. The exponent and the denominator have to match before that result can be quoted.
  • Answering 12\frac{1}{2} by dividing where you should multiply. Compensating for a denominator of 2x2x needs a factor of 22 out front.
  • Writing e2x=2exe^{2x} = 2e^x. The correct rearrangement is e2x=(ex)2e^{2x} = \left(e^x\right)^2.
  • Cancelling the xx in the exponent against the xx underneath. An exponent is not a factor, so nothing cancels.

Not sure which technique a limit wants?

The Limit Method Chooser walks the decision from direct substitution through factoring, the conjugate, and L'Hopital, and says why each one applies or fails.

Frequently asked questions

Why does the 22 survive when the exponential itself goes to 11?

Because the numerator and the denominator both collapse to 00, so the limit compares speeds, not values. Near 00 the numerator behaves like 2x2x, since e2x1+2xe^{2x} \approx 1 + 2x, so it shrinks half as fast as it would with exponent xx. Doubling the exponent doubles the slope, and the limit records the slope.

What is limx0ekx1x\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{e^{kx}-1}{x} in general?

It is kk, for any constant, positive or negative. The same multiply-and-divide step gives kekx1kxk \cdot \frac{e^{kx}-1}{kx}, whose second factor tends to 11. So e3x1x3\frac{e^{-3x}-1}{x} \to -3. If the denominator is mxmx rather than xx, the answer is km\frac{k}{m}.

Does the answer change if the denominator is 2x2x?

Yes, it becomes 11. With denominator 2x2x the exponent and the denominator already match, so limx0e2x12x=1\lim_{x \to 0}\frac{e^{2x}-1}{2x} = 1 and no adjustment is needed. Checking whether they match is the whole of the technique.