AP Calculus AB and BC
Limit of (e^x - e^-x) / x at 0 Is 2
The limit of e to the x minus e to the minus x, all over x, as x approaches 0 is 2. Splitting it gives two copies of the standard limit, one worth 1 and the other worth 1 again because the two minus signs multiply to a plus.
Settled by splitting into two standard exponential limits.
Splitting into two known limits
Add and subtract in the numerator so that each exponential gets its own copy of the standard limit.
The first term tends to . The second is the same limit with in place of , which contributes , and subtracting it adds .
Or read it as a derivative
The expression is the derivative of e^x minus e^-x at 0. That derivative is e^x plus e^-x, which is 2 at the origin. Same answer, one line.
Why the sign works out to addition
Two minus signs are in play and they multiply. Differentiating produces a from the chain rule, and the term is already being subtracted, so the two negatives combine into a positive contribution.
Compare the version with a plus sign in the middle: tends to , because there the contributions cancel instead of reinforcing.
The mistakes students make
- Answering by assuming the two exponentials cancel. At small they are nearly equal, but their DIFFERENCE is about , which is exactly the size of the denominator.
- Losing the chain rule sign on and answering .
- Cancelling the into the exponent. The downstairs is a factor, not something that can be moved into a power.
Not sure which technique a limit wants?
The Limit Method Chooser walks the decision from direct substitution through factoring, the conjugate, and L'Hopital, and says why each one applies or fails.
Frequently asked questions
What is the limit of (e^x - e^-x) / x as x approaches 0?
It is .
Why is the answer not 0?
The two exponentials are close but not equal: their difference is about near the origin, matching the denominator exactly.
What is the L'Hopital route?
One pass gives , which is at the origin.