AP Calculus AB and BC
Limit of (e^3x - 1)/x at 0 Is 3
The limit of e to the 3x minus 1, over x, as x approaches 0 is 3. Multiplying and dividing by 3 turns the quotient into e to the 3x minus 1 over 3x, which tends to 1. The factor of 3 left outside is the whole answer.
Settled by matching the exponent to the denominator.
Make the denominator match the exponent
Put . As so does , and the quotient on the right becomes , whose limit is . The out front is untouched by any of this.
The pattern
Whatever coefficient sits in the exponent walks straight out as the answer. The quotient of e to the kx minus 1 over x tends to k, for any constant k.
It is a derivative at a point
With you have , so the quotient is . That is the difference quotient for , and .
Recognising the shape is the fastest route on a no-calculator section, and it explains why the exponent coefficient survives while everything else cancels.
The mistakes students make
Each of these misreads where the 3 sits in the expression.
- Mistaking this for and giving its limit, . The in the exponent still has to be paid for.
- Reading the as a factor in front, as in . That numerator tends to , not , so the quotient has no finite limit at all.
- Cancelling the in the exponent against the in the denominator, as if , and reporting . An sitting in an exponent is not a factor, so there is nothing there to cancel.
Not sure which technique a limit wants?
The Limit Method Chooser walks the decision from direct substitution through factoring, the conjugate, and L'Hopital, and says why each one applies or fails.
Frequently asked questions
What is the limit of (e^3x - 1)/x at 0?
It is .
Why does the 3 come out in front?
The standard limit needs the denominator to match the exponent. Writing supplies the matching and leaves a factor of behind.
Can I use L'Hopital here?
Yes. The form is , and differentiating top and bottom gives , which is at .