AP Calculus AB and BC
Known Cross-Sections vs Solids of Revolution
Both methods integrate cross-sectional area along an axis. A solid of revolution always has circular or ring-shaped slices because it is swept by rotation. A solid with known cross-sections can have squares, semicircles, or triangles instead, and the problem tells you which.
Solid of revolution
Use when: The problem says a region is rotated or revolved about a line.
Known cross-sections
Use when: The problem describes slices of a stated shape built on a base region.
Side by side
| Revolution | Known cross-sections | |
|---|---|---|
| Slice shape | Circle or ring | Whatever the problem states |
| Formula | ||
| Key quantity | The radius | The base segment width |
| Involves | Always | Only for circular shapes |
Revolution is the special case where happens to be . Once you see that, both problems reduce to the same job: write the area of a representative slice as a function of position, then integrate.
For known cross-sections the base segment width does the work. Squares give , equilateral triangles give , and semicircles give because the segment is the diameter.
The semicircle trap
When cross-sections are semicircles the base segment is the diameter, so the radius is half of it. Using the full width as the radius quadruples the answer.
Frequently asked questions
Do I ever need pi for known cross-sections?
Only when the stated shape is circular, such as a semicircle. Squares and triangles produce no pi at all.
In the CED: Unit 8: Applications of Integration