Multivariable calculus
Limit of x^2y/(x^4+y^2): Lines Agree, Limit Still Fails
The limit of x^2 y/(x^4 + y^2) at the origin does not exist. Every straight line through the origin gives 0, so the line test finds nothing wrong. The parabola y = x^2 gives 1/2 at every point. One disagreeing path is enough, so the limit fails.
The limit does not exist
| Path | Limit along it |
|---|---|
| along y = 0 | 0 |
| along y = x | 0 |
| along the parabola y = x^2 | 0.5 |
Match the degrees, then choose the path
Start with lines, because they are what everyone tries first. Put into and simplify.
For any fixed this goes to as . The -axis, where , has numerator zero throughout, and so does the vertical line . So every line agrees on , and a student who stops here concludes the limit is .
Look at the denominator to see why lines are hopeless. The two terms and balance when is comparable to , not to . On a line, swamps near the origin, so the fraction is really , which vanishes. Choose the path that makes both terms the same size instead.
The function is exactly at every point of the parabola , arbitrarily close to the origin. Since lines give and this parabola gives , the limit does not exist.
The rule of thumb for picking the killer path
Read the denominator and ask which curve makes its two terms comparable. Here and are equal in size along , so those are the candidate paths. The family shows the whole spread of values.
- gives , the largest value.
- gives , the smallest.
- recovers the value that the lines produced.
- Any two different values of already disprove the limit.
Polar coordinates are less helpful here than usual. The function becomes , and for fixed with this tends to . Holding fixed is just the line test wearing different clothes, so it misses the parabola too.
The mistake: believing that all lines is the same as all paths
This function exists in every textbook for one reason: it breaks the belief that checking lines is enough. Approaching along all straight lines gives , and yet the limit does not exist. There is no finite list of paths whose agreement proves existence.
The practical habit: after lines agree, do not write the limit down. Either find a curve that balances the denominator, or prove the limit with an inequality. For this function the search succeeds, because reaches on points as close to the origin as you like.
The same trap appears with , where the killer path is the sideways parabola , and with , where it is the cubic . In each case the winning path is the one that makes the denominator's two terms the same order.
Frequently asked questions
Is the function bounded near the origin?
Yes. By the inequality , you get everywhere the function is defined. It is bounded and still has no limit, which shows boundedness alone proves nothing.
Why does the parabola work when the lines do not?
On a line the term dominates , so the denominator behaves like and the degree-three numerator loses. On both denominator terms are , matching the numerator's , so the ratio is a nonzero constant.