Multivariable calculus
Limit of (x^4-y^4)/(x^2+y^2) at the Origin
The limit of (x^4 - y^4) / (x^2 + y^2) as (x, y) approaches the origin is 0. Because x^4 - y^4 factors as (x^2 - y^2)(x^2 + y^2), the quotient equals x^2 - y^2 at every point other than the origin. That is a polynomial, so its limit is its value there, namely 0.
The limit exists
| Path | Limit along it |
|---|---|
| along y = 0 | 0 |
| along y = x | 0 |
| along y = 2x | 0 |
Factor the numerator exactly
This one is easier than it looks. The difference of two squares runs twice: .
The right side is a polynomial, hence continuous everywhere, so its limit at the origin is simply its value: . No squeeze, no polar coordinates, no inequality. The difficulty was an illusion created by how the fraction was written.
Check the paths against it. Along you get , along you get exactly , along you get . All tend to , as the simplified form guarantees.
Confirming with polar coordinates
It is worth having a second, independent route. Substituting and gives a numerator of degree four against a denominator of degree two.
The last equality uses the same difference of squares: .
Two methods, same answer. When a result is going to be used, getting it twice by different routes is cheap insurance.
The mistake: cancelling a factor that is not there
The cancellation works here for a specific reason: divides exactly, with no remainder. Students then carry the move to or , where the denominator is not a factor of the numerator, and cancel anyway. Nothing cancels, and the expression that comes out is a different function with a different limit.
Before cancelling, multiply back and check you recover the original numerator. Here , so the step is exact.
The second half of the mistake is forgetting the domain. and agree at every point except the origin, where is undefined and equals . That is harmless for a limit, since a limit never inspects the point itself, but the two are not the same function.
Frequently asked questions
Does the same trick work for (x^4+y^4)/(x^2+y^2)?
Not by factoring, because does not divide . Use polar instead: the quotient becomes , and since that trigonometric factor lies between and , the value is squeezed to .
Why do the path tests give 0 so easily here?
Because after cancelling, is a continuous function, so every path is bound to give . When a rational expression simplifies to something continuous, the limit is never in doubt; the real work is confirming that the simplification is exact rather than wishful.