Multivariable calculus
Limit of xyz/(x^2+y^2+z^2) at the Origin
The limit of xyz / (x^2 + y^2 + z^2) as (x, y, z) approaches the origin is 0. Since 2|xy| is at most x^2 + y^2, the quotient is bounded in size by |z|/2, which goes to 0 under any approach. In spherical coordinates the function is rho times a bounded trigonometric factor.
The limit exists
| Path | Limit along it |
|---|---|
| along the x axis | 0 |
| along the diagonal x = y = z | 0 |
| along y = x in the plane z = 0 | 0 |
Paths in space
Start with an axis, the main diagonal , and a line lying in the plane .
In three variables the path problem gets worse, not better. Approaches can run along lines, curves, or spirals, and the set of directions is a whole sphere rather than a circle. Testing a few and generalising is even less defensible than it was in the plane.
A one line bound
Start from , which rearranges to . Feed that into the numerator.
The last step uses , so that fraction is at most . Every approach to the origin forces , so the bound collapses and is squeezed to .
Spherical coordinates give the same conclusion and show why it happens. With , , , the numerator is degree three in and the denominator degree two.
The mistake: checking the coordinate axes only
Along each coordinate axis two of the three variables are zero, so the numerator is identically zero and the function is flat at . Three effortless zeros feel conclusive and carry no information at all: the path killed the numerator before the denominator ever had a chance to matter.
A useful habit follows from that. When a path makes the numerator vanish identically, that path tells you nothing about the limit. Pick approaches where the numerator survives, such as above, and then close the argument with a bound that holds on a whole ball.
The same trap appears in two variables with functions like , which is along both axes and along , and has no limit. Axis testing would have reported a limit of with total confidence.
Frequently asked questions
Does this limit exist in every dimension?
The same argument works for whenever , because the numerator has degree and the denominator degree . At the quotient is , which has no limit: along the axes, along .
Is the bound |z|/2 better than the spherical one?
They are the same fact in different clothes. The bound needs no change of coordinates and is quicker to write down. The spherical version makes the reason visible: three factors of the radius upstairs against two downstairs, leaving one factor of to drive everything to zero.