AP Calculus AB and BC
Integral of csc x: Answer, Derivation, Mistakes
The integral of csc x is -ln|csc x + cot x| + C. You get it by multiplying the integrand by (csc x + cot x)/(csc x + cot x), which makes the numerator the derivative of the denominator, so the substitution u = csc x + cot x turns the problem into -du/u. It holds on any interval free of the points where sin x = 0.
Why the integral of csc x is -ln|csc x + cot x|
Unlike , this one is not a derivative rule read backwards. Nothing in your table differentiates to , so the move is to rewrite the integrand until substitution (Topic 6.9, Integrating Using Substitution) applies. Multiply by a form of chosen so the numerator becomes the derivative of the denominator.
Now let . From Topic 2.10 (Finding the Derivatives of Tangent, Cotangent, Secant, and/or Cosecant Functions), and , so . The numerator above is exactly .
Check it by differentiating, which is how you should check every antiderivative. With , the chain rule gives .
The minus sign is the whole difference from sec x
Compare . The same trick produces both, but the cosecant derivatives each carry a minus sign, so the cosecant answer picks up the leading minus. Cofunction results in calculus almost always differ from their partners by exactly one sign.
Equivalent forms you may see
Three answers that look different are the same function, so a textbook, a solver, and your teacher can all be right at once. Since , the product equals , which makes the two factors reciprocals and flips the sign of the logarithm.
The half-angle version follows from . All three differentiate to , and all three agree numerically on , so use whichever your class writes. If a grader expects one form, convert with the identity rather than reworking the integral.
Where this integral shows up on the AP exam
Topic 6.8 (Finding Antiderivatives and Indefinite Integrals: Basic Rules and Notation) is where the memorized list lives, and sits at the edge of it: the basic cosecant facts you are expected to recall instantly are and . Unit 6 carries a weighting of 15 to 20 percent on both AB and BC.
Inside a composite, substitution puts the constant out front. With and :
On a definite integral, both endpoints have to lie between consecutive zeros of , since blows up wherever . Both endpoints below sit inside , so the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus applies.
It also arrives in Unit 7 through separable differential equations. Separating gives , so the solution carries this logarithm on both sides.
Common mistakes with the integral of csc x
- Dropping the leading minus sign. Writing differentiates to , which is off by a factor of on every problem that uses it.
- Answering . That is . The square is what makes that one immediate and this one require the rewrite.
- Answering . That is , a different integrand.
- Guessing because the answer contains a logarithm. Only produces , and is not the derivative of over itself. Differentiating gives , not .
- Multiplying by and then mishandling the sign. That version works too and gives , but the numerator then matches , so there is no leading minus.
- Integrating across an asymptote. is not by symmetry: the integrand is unbounded at inside the interval, so the Fundamental Theorem does not apply and the integral diverges.
- Confusing it with , which really is a integral and needs no trick.
Quick practice with csc integrands
- , with .
- , with and .
- .
- .
- and , the two you should never have to derive.
- , with .
Every answer on this page is machine checked
An automated test differentiates the antiderivative above and confirms it returns the integrand. A wrong sign or a missing factor fails the build, so it cannot reach you.
Frequently asked questions
Is the same as ?
Yes. Because , the quantities and are reciprocals, and . Both differentiate to , so both are correct antiderivatives.
Why do you multiply by ?
Because it manufactures a pattern. The numerator becomes , which is exactly , so turns the integral into . Nothing else about the integrand suggests substitution, which is why this one is memorized as a trick rather than discovered.
What is the difference between and ?
They are unrelated in difficulty. is a derivative rule reversed and takes no work. needs the multiply-by-one rewrite. Read the exponent before you start.
Where is valid?
On any open interval where , such as . At every multiple of the integrand has a vertical asymptote, so one antiderivative cannot bridge two intervals and a definite integral whose limits straddle a multiple of diverges.