AP Calculus AB and BC
U-Substitution: How to Choose u and Integrate It
Choose u as the inside function of a composite whose derivative also appears in the integrand, up to a constant multiple. Find du, rewrite the whole integral in u, integrate, then back-substitute. For a definite integral, convert the bounds to u-values. If du is nowhere present, substitution is the wrong tool.
When u-substitution is the right tool
Reach for u-substitution (CED Topic 6.9) when the integrand is a composite function multiplied by the derivative of its inside. Substitution is the chain rule run backward: the chain rule turns into , so an integral that carries both a composite piece and the derivative of its inner function is set up to be un-chained.
The recognition signal is a two-part pattern. First, find an inner function tucked inside something else: the base of a power, the radicand of a root, the exponent on , the argument of a trig function, or a denominator. Second, check whether , the derivative of that inner function, also shows up in the integrand. It only has to match up to a constant multiple, since constants are easy to carry through. When both parts are present, substitution collapses the whole integral into a basic one. On the AP exam this technique appears on both multiple-choice and free-response questions, often buried inside a larger accumulation or area problem.
The one-line test
If differentiating your candidate for produces something already in the integrand (times any constant), substitution is worth trying; if the rest of the integrand also collapses into with no stray remaining, it works. If differentiating produces a factor that is nowhere to be found, choose a different or a different method.
Choosing u: pick the inside
The choice of decides everything, and the rule is short: let be the inner function whose derivative appears. In the inside is because it is raised to a power, and its derivative is sitting right there as a factor. In the inside is , since its derivative is the other factor. In the inside is , the argument of the cosine.
Work from the outside in. Ask what function is wrapped around another, then name the wrapped part . A reliable checklist of candidates: the base of a power such as ; the expression under a root; the exponent of ; the argument of , , or ; and the denominator of a fraction. After you pick, differentiate to confirm is available. A leftover constant is harmless, since you fix it by multiplying and dividing. A leftover variable is a warning sign that the choice may be wrong.
One subtlety: the inside is not always the most complicated-looking chunk. It is specifically the function whose derivative you can find elsewhere. In the tempting choice is , but its derivative is not in the integrand; the right choice is , whose derivative matches the factor. Let the available derivative, not the visual bulk, decide.
The five steps
Once is chosen, the procedure is mechanical.
- Set and differentiate to get .
- Solve for the exact piece the integral contains. If but the integral has , then .
- Rewrite the integral so that no remains anywhere, including inside the . A surviving means the substitution is incomplete.
- Integrate in terms of using the basic antiderivative rules.
- For an indefinite integral, back-substitute and add . For a definite integral, handle the bounds instead.
Steps two and three are where substitution succeeds or fails. If you can express every -piece in terms of and , the integral was a genuine substitution. If you cannot, the setup is telling you to reconsider .
Definite integrals: convert the bounds
For a definite integral, the essential-knowledge point of Topic 6.9 (FUN-6.D.2) is that substitution requires corresponding changes to the limits of integration. The bounds written on the integral are -values. The moment you switch the variable to , those numbers no longer describe where you are, so you must deal with them on purpose.
There are two safe routes. The cleaner one: convert the limits by plugging each original bound into , then evaluate the antiderivative entirely in and never return to . The alternative: find the antiderivative, back-substitute to , then use the original -bounds. Pick one and commit to it.
The most common mistake
Do not plug the original -bounds into an antiderivative still written in . Either convert the bounds to -values, or convert the antiderivative back to first. Mixing the two gives a wrong number every time.
What a failed choice looks like
A wrong announces itself quickly, which is useful, because you can bail out before wasting time. Three failure patterns cover almost every case.
The inner derivative is missing. Set in and you get , but there is no anywhere in the integrand to absorb it. The substitution stalls, and this particular integral has no elementary antiderivative at all. The lesson is that the derivative of your has to actually be present, not just wished for.
A variable factor is left behind. If rewriting the integral in still leaves a stray , the choice usually needs rescuing. Sometimes you can solve for and substitute that expression too, as in Example 3. If that does not clear the , abandon the choice and try a different or a different technique from Topic 6.14.
The constant gets dropped. When but the integrand carries only , the factor of is easy to forget. Carry it through, and always confirm by differentiating your answer, which should reproduce the original integrand exactly.
Worked examples
Worked example
Indefinite integral with a constant adjustment
Evaluate .
- Recognize the pattern. The inside function is , raised to the fourth power, and its derivative appears in the integrand as the factor (up to the constant ). Let .
- Differentiate: , so . Solve for the piece present in the integral: .
- Rewrite everything in : .
- Integrate: .
- Back-substitute and add the constant: .
- Check by differentiating: , which is the original integrand.
Worked example
Definite integral: convert the bounds
Evaluate .
- Identify the inside. Under the root is , and its derivative is exactly the other factor. Let .
- Differentiate: , so the entire non-root part becomes with no constant to adjust.
- Convert the limits, since these are -values. When , . When , .
- Rewrite the integral entirely in : .
- Integrate: .
- Evaluate at the new bounds: .
Worked example
When a stray x survives: solve for x
Evaluate .
- Pick the inside. The inner function is , under the root. Its derivative is , which is present, but there is an extra factor of that is not the derivative. Let and plan to rewrite that stray .
- Differentiate: . To handle the leftover , solve the substitution for : since , we have .
- Replace every -piece: .
- Expand the product so the power rule applies: .
- Integrate term by term: .
- Back-substitute : .
- Check by differentiating: , the original integrand.
Frequently asked questions
How do you know what to pick for u in u-substitution?
Pick the inner function whose derivative also appears in the integrand. Test it by differentiating your candidate: if the result (times any constant) is already a factor in the integral, the choice works. Bases of powers, radicands, exponents of , trig arguments, and denominators are the usual candidates.
Do you always have to change the limits in u-substitution?
Only for definite integrals, and only if you finish the calculation in . Convert each -bound with , then evaluate in . The alternative is to back-substitute to first and keep the original bounds. Never plug -bounds into a -antiderivative.
What do I do if there is still an x after substituting?
First try solving your substitution for and replacing the stray factor, as in Example 3. If an still survives, the choice of is wrong, so pick a different inner function or switch to another technique.
Is u-substitution on the AP Calculus exam?
Yes. It is Topic 6.9, part of both AB and BC, and it appears on multiple-choice and free-response questions, often as one step inside a larger accumulation or area problem rather than as a standalone prompt.