AP Calculus AB and BC
Derivative of sqrt(x): Answer, Proof, and Mistakes
The derivative of the square root of x is 1 over 2 times the square root of x, written f'(x) = 1/(2 sqrt(x)). It comes from the power rule: rewrite sqrt(x) as x^(1/2), so the derivative is (1/2)x^(-1/2). The slope is defined for x > 0 and grows without bound as x approaches 0.
The proof: it is just the power rule
The square root is a power in disguise. Rewrite as , then apply the power rule with .
Rewrite before you differentiate
Radicals and variables in a denominator are power-rule problems in disguise. Turn every square root into a fractional exponent, , and every into , before you touch the derivative. Skipping that step is where most coefficient and sign errors begin.
Why the slope blows up at x = 0
The function is defined at , where , but its derivative is not. As shrinks toward , shrinks with it, so grows without bound.
Geometrically, the graph leaves the origin with a vertical tangent line, and a vertical line has no finite slope. So is continuous at but not differentiable there. The domain of is , one endpoint narrower than the domain of itself.
Where √x shows up on the AP exam
You rarely differentiate a bare on the exam. The plain case is a one-line power-rule check, but square roots earn their points inside larger expressions, where they force a chain rule or hide in a distance formula.
| Context | What you do | CED location |
|---|---|---|
| A bare term | Power rule with | Unit 2, Topic 2.5 (Applying the Power Rule) |
| A composite | Chain rule: outside times inside | Unit 3, Topic 3.1 (The Chain Rule) |
| Distance in related rates | Chain rule while differentiating with respect to time | Unit 4, Topics 4.4 to 4.5 |
| Arc length integrand, (BC) | Set up the integral, then evaluate | Unit 8, Topic 8.13 |
The differentiation units are heavily weighted. Unit 2 (fundamental derivative rules) is worth 10 to 15 percent of the AB exam and 5 to 10 percent of BC; Unit 3 (chain rule and composites) is worth 5 to 10 percent on both. Knowing cold frees time for the harder composites built on top of it.
Common mistakes
- Misplacing the coefficient . The derivative is , not or . The coefficient multiplies , so both the and the root land in the denominator, never in the numerator.
- Forgetting to subtract from the exponent. Differentiating gives , not . The new exponent is .
- Dropping the chain rule. For the answer is ; writing alone leaves out the inside derivative .
- Reporting a slope at . There is none, since the tangent is vertical, so does not exist even though .
- Confusing the derivative with the integral. , while . Adding to the exponent is integration; subtracting is differentiation.
Two chain-rule composites
Every composite reuses the same outside derivative, , multiplied by the inside derivative .
Take . Here and .
Take . Here and .
The pattern never changes: differentiate the root, then multiply by the derivative of whatever sits under it.
Check yourself, not just the answer
Type derivatives and get graded on mathematical equivalence, with rule-level hints when you miss, in the Derivative Practice Checker.
Frequently asked questions
What is the derivative of ?
It is , valid for . Rewrite as and use the power rule: the exponent comes down as a coefficient and drops to , giving .
Why is the in the denominator?
Because the power rule brings the exponent down as a coefficient. That multiplies , so the product is , with both the and the root below the bar.
Is differentiable at ?
No. The function is continuous at because as , matching its value ; but the graph has a vertical tangent there, so the slope is undefined. The derivative exists only for .
How do you differentiate ?
Use the chain rule: . For example, and .