AP Calculus AB and BC
Derivative of e^sqrt(x): Answer, Proof, Mistakes
The derivative of e^sqrt(x) is e^sqrt(x) divided by 2 sqrt x. The exponential reproduces itself under differentiation, so the entire calculation reduces to the chain factor, and the derivative of sqrt x is 1 over 2 sqrt x, which divides rather than multiplies.
Differentiating e^sqrt(x)
Nothing about the exponential changes when you differentiate it, so all of the work sits in the inner function. Take , so that , and apply .
The exponent stays exactly as it was. A derivative such as or would mean the exponential rule had been mixed up with the power rule.
A tame function with an unbounded derivative
At the function is perfectly well behaved: , and is continuous on with no kink or gap. The derivative tells a different story.
The numerator tends to and the denominator tends to from above, so the slope runs off to infinity and the graph leaves the point with a vertical tangent. Continuity at a point promises nothing about differentiability there, and this is a clean example of the gap.
Far to the right the derivative is large again, for the opposite reason: eventually outgrows by any margin. The smallest slope sits in between, at , where the derivative equals .
The mistakes students make
Two of these come from stopping too early, and one from reaching for the wrong rule.
- Answering on its own. The exponential does reproduce itself, but the chain rule still demands the factor .
- Answering and losing the . The derivative of is , and that one half is part of the answer.
- Answering by pulling the exponent down. The power rule applies to raised to a constant, not to a constant raised to a function of .
Check yourself, not just the answer
Type derivatives and get graded on mathematical equivalence, with rule-level hints when you miss, in the Derivative Practice Checker.
Frequently asked questions
What is the derivative of e^sqrt(x)?
It is for , the original function divided by .
Why does the derivative blow up at x = 0?
Because tends to while tends to . The function itself is fine at , with value , but its tangent line there is vertical.
Can I do this with logarithmic differentiation?
Yes. Put , so and . Multiplying back by returns .