Multivariable calculus
Critical Points of xy e^(-x^2-y^2)
f(x,y) = xy e^(-x^2-y^2) has exactly five critical points. The origin is a saddle with D = -1. The two points where x and y are both 1/sqrt2 or both -1/sqrt2 are local maxima with D = 4/e^2, about 0.5413, and value 1/(2e). The two points where x and y have opposite signs are local minima with the same D.
- saddle pointdiscriminant D = -1
- local maximumdiscriminant D = 0.5413411329464508
- local maximumdiscriminant D = 0.5413411329464508
- local minimumdiscriminant D = 0.5413411329464508
- local minimumdiscriminant D = 0.5413411329464508
Factor first, then enumerate the cases
Each partial needs the product rule, and the two resulting terms share a common factor that is worth pulling out immediately.
The exponential is never zero, so it divides out of both equations and leaves two factored conditions.
Now enumerate. The first equation gives or . The second gives or . Pairing them off:
- with gives the origin.
- with is a contradiction, so nothing.
- with is a contradiction, so nothing.
- with gives four points, one in each quadrant.
Five points in total, and because the enumeration was exhaustive, that is the complete list.
Classifying all five at once
The second partials are more pleasant than they look, especially the mixed one, which factors completely.
At the origin the first two vanish and , so and the point is a saddle. Near the exponential is close to 1 and behaves like , positive in two opposite quadrants and negative in the other two.
At the four outer points, , so both factors in are zero and the mixed partial disappears. The exponent is there, and , so the diagonal entries reduce to .
The discriminant is the same positive number at all four, so alone decides. Where and agree in sign, and : local maxima with . Where they differ in sign, , , and those are local minima with .
Those extremes are global. Since , writing gives , and the right side is largest at , where it equals .
The mistake students make
The most common loss is the origin itself. Students factor the two equations, jump to the interesting case and , report four critical points and stop. The case satisfies both equations just as legitimately, and it is the only saddle on the surface. Enumerating all four pairings on paper, including the ones that die, is what prevents this.
The second error is dropping a term from the product rule. Differentiating in means differentiating a product of and the exponential, so both pieces contribute.
Keep only the second term and you get , with from the same slip in . Both vanish on the whole -axis and the whole -axis, so the answer becomes two full lines of critical points in place of the single saddle at the origin, and the factor that locates the four real extrema never appears.
A cheap check: the four outer critical points must sit at , distance 1 from the origin. If your answer puts them anywhere else, or puts them on an axis, the product rule is the first place to look.
Frequently asked questions
Why do all four outer points share the same discriminant?
Because the surface has a symmetry. Replacing with turns into , and so does replacing with . Sign changes flip maxima into minima but leave curvature magnitudes alone, so and change sign together while stays zero. The product is then unchanged, and at every one of the four.
Is the list of five points really complete?
Yes. Both partials factor as a product of a never zero exponential with two simple algebraic factors, and setting a product to zero means setting one factor to zero. The four pairings of those factors are exhaustive, two are contradictory, and the remaining two yield the origin and the four outer points. No approximation or search is involved, so nothing can be hiding elsewhere in the plane.