AP Calculus BC
Does the Sum of (-1)^n·n/(n^2+1) Converge? Conditionally
The series converges, but only conditionally. The alternating series test applies because the term sizes decrease to zero. Strip the signs, though, and the terms behave like one over n, so the absolute series diverges.
Converges
Settled by the alternating series test, and only conditionally.
Both conditions, checked properly
The sizes are . Dividing top and bottom by gives , which clearly tends to 0, so the second condition holds.
For the first, treat the size as a function of a real variable: has , which is negative for . So the sizes decrease from onward, and the alternating series test applies.
The derivative route is worth the extra line here. Comparing with directly on a quotient like this is messy, and the sign of a derivative settles it at once.
Why the convergence is only conditional
The absolute series is . Limit comparison against the harmonic series gives , a finite nonzero number, so the two series share a fate.
The harmonic series diverges, so the absolute series diverges as well. The original converges only because of the cancellation the signs provide, which is exactly what conditional convergence means.
Not sure which test a series wants?
The Convergence Test Chooser walks the decision in order: nth term first, then geometric and p-series pattern matching, then alternating structure, then the ratio test, and finally the comparison family.
Frequently asked questions
How do I prove the term sizes are decreasing?
Treat them as a function of a real variable and show the derivative is negative for large enough inputs. That is usually faster than comparing consecutive terms directly.
What is the practical difference between conditional and absolute convergence?
A conditionally convergent series can be rearranged to sum to any value at all, so its order matters. An absolutely convergent one can be reordered freely without changing the sum.