Multivariable calculus
Partial Derivatives of sin(x)/(1 + y^2)
For f(x,y) = sin(x)/(1 + y^2), the partial with respect to x is cos(x)/(1 + y^2), and the partial with respect to y is -2y sin(x)/(1 + y^2) squared. Only the y-partial needs the quotient rule, since in x the denominator is a frozen constant.
A separated function makes each partial easy
This function factors as a function of times a function of , namely times . Whenever that happens, each partial keeps one factor untouched and differentiates the other.
For the numerator is constant, so the quotient rule collapses: the derivative of the top is zero and only the second term survives.
You could also write and use the power and chain rules, which gives , the same thing.
The mistake: using the quotient rule where a constant multiple would do
Running the full quotient rule for the -partial is not wrong, but it is where sign errors get born. The denominator has -derivative zero, so the subtracted term disappears and one factor of cancels. Skipping straight to a constant multiple is faster and safer.
- In the -partial the denominator is squared only if you go through the quotient rule and forget to cancel. The simplified answer has to the first power.
- In the -partial the minus sign comes from differentiating the denominator, not from the sine. Sine is untouched there.
- Since , nothing is ever undefined and no domain restrictions are needed.
A quick sanity check on the -partial: at any where , the whole -partial must be zero regardless of . If your expression still depends on in a way that survives there, something went wrong.
Reading the gradient at a point
At we have and , with .
The -component is zero on the whole line , because every term in the -partial carries the factor . On that line the surface is flat in the direction, sitting at height zero.
Frequently asked questions
Why does the y-partial have a squared denominator but the x-partial does not?
The quotient rule always produces the square, but in the -partial the surviving term still has a full factor of in the numerator, which cancels one copy. In the -partial nothing cancels, because the numerator term that would cancel is the one that vanished.
Where is this function largest?
The numerator is largest when and the denominator is smallest when , so the maximum value 1 occurs at points such as . Both partials are zero there, which is the algebraic confirmation.