AP Calculus AB and BC
Limit of sin 2x / x as x Approaches 0 Is 2
The limit of sin 2x over x as x approaches 0 is 2, not 1. Substitution gives 0/0. Multiply and divide by 2 to get 2 times sin 2x over 2x, so the sine argument matches its denominator and that fraction tends to 1. The coefficient 2 survives, which is the whole point.
Settled by matching the special trigonometric limit.
Force the argument to match the denominator
The special limit demands that the sine's argument and the denominator be the same expression. Here they are and , so multiply by , which changes nothing, and park one 2 outside.
Now the fraction is the special limit in the variable , and whenever , so it tends to 1. The constant rides along untouched.
The double-angle identity lands in the same place: , so the quotient is , and the three factors give .
Why substitution fails and why the answer is not 1
Substituting gives , indeterminate. The more expensive error comes next: a student who has memorised the sine limit sees a sine over an and writes 1 by pattern match, without checking that the arguments agree.
They do not agree, and the mismatch is the entire answer. For small the numerator behaves like while the denominator is , so the quotient sits near 2. Doubling the angle doubles the numerator, and nothing in the expression cancels that.
| 0.1 | 1.986693 |
| 0.01 | 1.999867 |
| 0.001 | 1.999999 |
Common mistakes
- Answering 1. The special limit applies only after the rewrite; is not yet in the form .
- Multiplying by 2 without dividing by 2. The step keeps the expression equal to the original; changing the denominator to on its own changes the function.
- Cancelling the 2s or pulling the 2 out of the sine. is not , and no cancellation with the denominator is available.
- Rebuilding the rewrite from scratch every time instead of using .
- Dropping the chain rule inside L'Hopital. The rule gives , and the 2 on top is exactly the coefficient the algebraic rewrite exposes; differentiating as loses it.
Not sure which technique a limit wants?
The Limit Method Chooser walks the decision from direct substitution through factoring, the conjugate, and L'Hopital, and says why each one applies or fails.
Frequently asked questions
Why is the limit 2 instead of 1?
The special limit needs the sine's argument and the denominator to match. Here the argument is twice the denominator, so the numerator is roughly against a denominator of . Rewriting as makes the surviving factor of 2 visible.
Is there a general formula?
Yes: for nonzero . Multiply and divide by to get , whose fraction tends to 1.
Does L'Hopital's rule confirm it?
It does. The form is , and differentiating gives . The chain rule supplies the same factor of 2 that the rewrite produces.