AP Calculus AB and BC
Limit of 1/x as x Approaches Infinity
The limit of 1 over x as x approaches infinity is 0. The numerator is fixed while the denominator grows without bound, so the quotient is squeezed toward 0 without ever reaching it, and y = 0 is the horizontal asymptote. Every rational-function limit at infinity is built on this one fact.
Settled by end behaviour.
How the value follows
Nothing changes on top while the bottom grows past every bound, so the quotient has to shrink past every positive bound. At the value is , at it is , and there is no stage at which it settles anywhere but 0.
The generalisation carries the same argument. Any positive power works, and the larger the power the faster the collapse.
The other end behaves the same way in value: , with the values negative and rising toward 0 from below. So is a horizontal asymptote in both directions.
Why one over infinity is not an evaluation
You cannot substitute , because is not a number in the real system. Writing is shorthand for the end-behaviour argument, not a step of arithmetic, and treating it as arithmetic is what produces claims like .
The honest version of the statement is about eventual size: for any tolerance you pick, past some point the values of stay inside it. Pick and every qualifies. Pick and every qualifies.
is a different question with a different answer, and the function is the same. The approach point is doing all the work.
Where this fact does the work
Limits of rational functions at infinity all reduce to this one. Divide the numerator and denominator by the highest power of in the denominator, and every leftover term that still has an underneath dies by the fact above.
That is where the degree rule comes from. Equal degrees leave the ratio of leading coefficients, a larger denominator degree leaves 0, and a larger numerator degree leaves something unbounded.
The mistake students make
- Treating as arithmetic and extending it, for instance to . That subtraction is an indeterminate form and needs real work, while is not, which is why this limit has a settled answer and that one does not.
- Confusing the approach point. as , but blows up as .
- Saying the function reaches 0. The equation has no solution, so the graph never touches its asymptote. A limit describes what the values approach, not what they attain.
- Concluding there is no horizontal asymptote because the limit came out to 0. A limit of 0 is a horizontal asymptote, at .
Not sure which technique a limit wants?
The Limit Method Chooser walks the decision from direct substitution through factoring, the conjugate, and L'Hopital, and says why each one applies or fails.
Frequently asked questions
Does 1/x ever equal 0?
No. has no solution, so the graph never touches . The limit statement is about the values getting and staying arbitrarily close to 0, which they do.
Is the answer the same as x approaches negative infinity?
Yes, still 0. The values are negative on that side and climb toward 0 from below, so serves as the horizontal asymptote at both ends of the graph.
Why is this not an indeterminate form?
Only one part is moving. The numerator is pinned at 1 and the denominator is unbounded, so the outcome is forced. Indeterminate forms need two competing behaviours, such as .