AP Calculus AB and BC
Integral of csc x cot x: Answer and Proof
The integral of csc x cot x with respect to x is -csc x + C. The product csc x cot x is the negative of the derivative of csc x, since d/dx csc x = -csc x cot x, so the antiderivative is -csc x. Differentiating -csc x returns csc x cot x.
How to integrate csc x cot x
Like the other reciprocal-trig products, this one is read straight off the derivative table. You want the function whose derivative is , and the cosecant rule supplies it.
The derivative of is , so to land on a positive you differentiate instead. That makes the antiderivative.
Check it by differentiating
Differentiate : the derivative of is , so the derivative of is , the integrand. The minus in the answer cancels the minus in the derivative rule.
Where the integral of csc x cot x shows up on the AP exam
It is a Topic 6.8 basic antiderivative, part of the 15 to 20 percent that Unit 6 carries. It is the mirror image of ; the only differences are the co-functions and the minus sign.
As with , the domain matters. is undefined where , so a definite integral straddling a multiple of is improper.
Common mistakes with the integral of csc x cot x
- Dropping the minus sign and writing . Differentiating gives , the wrong sign.
- Confusing it with . The secant pair has no minus; the cosecant pair does.
- Answering . That is the antiderivative of , not of .
- Integrating across . On any interval containing a multiple of the integrand has a vertical asymptote and the integral diverges.
Every answer on this page is machine checked
An automated test differentiates the antiderivative above and confirms it returns the integrand. A wrong sign or a missing factor fails the build, so it cannot reach you.
Frequently asked questions
What is the integral of csc x cot x?
It is . Since , differentiating gives , so that is the antiderivative.
Why is there a minus sign?
Because the cosecant derivative already has one: . Reversing a derivative that produced a negative means negating, so is the antiderivative of .
How does it compare to the integral of sec x tan x?
They are mirror images. has no minus sign, while does, because the cosecant derivative carries the minus.