AP Calculus AB and BC
Derivative of 1/x: Answer, Proof, and Mistakes
The derivative of 1/x is -1/x^2, also written -x^(-2). Rewrite 1/x as x^(-1) and use the power rule: the exponent -1 moves out front and drops by one, giving -1 times x^(-2) = -1/x^2. Because x^2 is positive for every x except 0, this slope is always negative, so 1/x decreases on each of its two branches.
The proof: rewrite 1/x as a power
Start by writing the reciprocal as a power. Since , this is an ordinary power-rule derivative, not a separate rule to memorize.
The power rule says . With , the exponent comes down as the coefficient out front, and the new exponent is . That leading is the source of the minus sign in the answer.
The quotient rule gives the same result. Treating as a quotient with constant numerator :
The derivative of the numerator is , so only the term survives, and the in the denominator comes from squaring the bottom.
The slope is negative everywhere, so 1/x is decreasing
For every , , so is negative. The slope of is never zero and never positive, which means it has no critical points and no turning points.
So is decreasing on each of its two branches, and , taken separately. Avoid saying it is decreasing for all : the domain is split by the vertical asymptote at , where the function is undefined, and the two branches are not one connected piece.
Every entry in the last column is negative. The slope grows steeper (more negative) as approaches and flattens toward as gets large.
Where 1/x shows up on the AP exam
On the AP Calculus AB and BC exams, is a direct application of the power rule from Unit 2, Topic 2.5 (Applying the Power Rule). Unit 2 carries about 10-15% of the AB exam and 5-10% of the BC exam.
It shows up more often inside composites. Whenever you differentiate , the chain rule from Unit 3, Topic 3.1 (The Chain Rule) turns the outer into and multiplies by . Differentiating is also a special case of the quotient rule (Topic 2.9), with a constant numerator, so you get the same factor either way.
Do not confuse it with the antiderivative
, but (Unit 6, Topic 6.8). Differentiating and antidifferentiating it point in opposite directions, and neither one equals .
Common mistakes
- Dropping the minus sign and writing instead of . The derivative is negative everywhere, so a positive answer is wrong on sight.
- Mixing up the two directions: , while . The reciprocal being the derivative of does not make it the derivative of .
- Botching the new exponent: from you subtract to reach , not or . Subtracting from a negative exponent is where the slip happens.
- Assuming the derivative comes from squaring the function. The in the denominator comes from the power rule (or from squaring the denominator in the quotient rule), not from squaring .
- Skipping the chain rule on composites: is not , because you still multiply by the inner derivative .
Two chain-rule examples
Example 1. Differentiate . Let , so the outer function is with derivative , and the inner derivative is .
Example 2. Differentiate . Here and , so multiply the outer by .
In both problems the outer step is the same you get from ; the chain rule just appends the inner derivative.
Check yourself, not just the answer
Type derivatives and get graded on mathematical equivalence, with rule-level hints when you miss, in the Derivative Practice Checker.
Frequently asked questions
What is the derivative of 1/x?
It is . Rewrite as and apply the power rule: the exponent multiplies out front and drops to , giving .
Why is the derivative of 1/x negative?
Because has in the denominator for every , the whole expression stays negative. That matches the graph: falls as you move left to right along each branch.
Is the derivative of 1/x the same as the derivative of ln x?
No. , but . The reciprocal is the derivative of ; differentiating itself gives a different, negative result.
What is the second derivative of 1/x?
Differentiate again: . So the second derivative of is .